Critical Question
«Critical Question 6. What are the relative merits in the Arctic of governance systems that emphasize ecosystem-based management (EBM) in contrast to sectoral or issue-specific arrangements?»
| 8 |
|
| Total: | 0 |
Links to source material:
Related articles:
- - AGP Critical Questions: Achieving regional sustainability
- - AGP Critical Questions: Amplifying Arctic voices
- - AGP Critical Questions: Strengthening policy mechanisms
- - AGP Critical Questions: Enhancing the Arctic as a zone of peace.
- - AGP Critical Questions: Promoting adaptation
- - AGP Critical Questions: Enhancing holistic or systems approaches
- - AGP Critical Questions: Strengthening regulatory frameworks
- - AGP Critical Questions: Building trust
- - Critical Question 1. Who are the major stakeholders in addressing matters of Arctic governance, and what are their basic interests?
- - Critical Question 10. How can we implement Arctic governance systems and, in the process, ensure a successful transition from paper to practice?
- - Critical Question 9: How can we make good use of scientific knowledge and other types of knowledge (e.g. indigenous and traditional knowledge) in meeting the demand for Arctic governance?
- - Critical Question 8. Is there a need for special provisions to protect the rights of indigenous peoples in Arctic governance?
- - Critical Question 7. How can we incorporate non-traditional governance systems, such as the Greenland Self-Government, the Finnmark Estate, the co-management arrangements in Canada and Alaska, or the experience in Canada and Alaska with public governments
- - Critical Question 5. How can we address issues of multi-level governance – integrating local, national, regional, and global arrangements – in the Arctic?
- - Critical Question 4. Do we need a comprehensive governance system focused on the Arctic Ocean?
- - Critical Question 3. Is there a need for a comprehensive and legally-binding treaty-based governance system covering the Arctic as a whole?
- - Critical Question 2. What sorts of arrangements are needed to provide effective governance in the Arctic treated as a complex socio-ecological system subject to changes that are nonlinear, abrupt, and irreversible?
Related critical questions and topics:
- - An Arctic Circle of Friends
- - Arctic Fisheries Conservation and Management: Initial Steps of Reform of the International Legal Framework
- - Arctic Offshore Oil and Gas Guidelines, 2009
- - Arctic Sea Partly Closed to Fishing
- - Best Practices in Ecosystem-based Oceans Management in the Arctic
- - Canadian Arctic waters get more protection
- - Environmental group sues to protect Arctic seals
- - ENVIRONMENTAL STANDARDS FOR OPERATIONS OF OIL AND GAS COMPANIES
- - Fisheries and coastal governance as a wicked problem
- - Green light to Barents Sea cod
- - Indigenous peoples participation in the framing of a new policy for the Arctic
- - Large Marine Ecosystems (LMEs)
- - New plan to govern Arctic fishing
- - Ocean task force holds Alaska hearing on better stewardship
- - Overfishing down 84 percent
- - Rising acidity erodes Alaska's fisheries
- - Russia’s plan for a nature reserve good for polar bears
- - Salazar sticks with Bush polar bear policy
- - Teriberka holds on to fisheries
- - US closes parts of Arctic to commercial fishing
What question would you add?
We at Arctic Governance project encourage you to contribute and add
a question you find important in the preservation of the Arctic.
The Arctic Governance Project will not publish or distribute your
name or information without having contacted you directly. Certain
responses may be included with the Critical Questions, but the
author will be contacted before their response is posted. We
appreciate your input and invite you to contribute your voice to the
conversation on Arctic Governance.
Revise a question
TESTING
The Arctic Governance Project will not publish or distribute your
name or information without having contacted you directly. Certain
responses may be included with the Critical Questions, but the
author will be contacted before their response is posted. We
appreciate your input and invite you to contribute your voice to the
conversation on Arctic Governance.
