Critical Question
«Critical Question 5. How can we address issues of multi-level governance – integrating local, national, regional, and global arrangements – in the Arctic?»
| 10 |
 Rank
12345
|
Revise this question
| Total: | 0 |
Related articles:
- - AGP Critical Questions: Achieving regional sustainability
- - AGP Critical Questions: Amplifying Arctic voices
- - AGP Critical Questions: Strengthening policy mechanisms
- - AGP Critical Questions: Enhancing the Arctic as a zone of peace.
- - AGP Critical Questions: Promoting adaptation
- - AGP Critical Questions: Enhancing holistic or systems approaches
- - AGP Critical Questions: Strengthening regulatory frameworks
- - AGP Critical Questions: Building trust
- - Critical Question 1. Who are the major stakeholders in addressing matters of Arctic governance, and what are their basic interests?
- - Critical Question 10. How can we implement Arctic governance systems and, in the process, ensure a successful transition from paper to practice?
- - Critical Question 9: How can we make good use of scientific knowledge and other types of knowledge (e.g. indigenous and traditional knowledge) in meeting the demand for Arctic governance?
- - Critical Question 8. Is there a need for special provisions to protect the rights of indigenous peoples in Arctic governance?
- - Critical Question 7. How can we incorporate non-traditional governance systems, such as the Greenland Self-Government, the Finnmark Estate, the co-management arrangements in Canada and Alaska, or the experience in Canada and Alaska with public governments
- - Critical Question 6. What are the relative merits in the Arctic of governance systems that emphasize ecosystem-based management (EBM) in contrast to sectoral or issue-specific arrangements?
- - Critical Question 4. Do we need a comprehensive governance system focused on the Arctic Ocean?
- - Critical Question 3. Is there a need for a comprehensive and legally-binding treaty-based governance system covering the Arctic as a whole?
- - Critical Question 2. What sorts of arrangements are needed to provide effective governance in the Arctic treated as a complex socio-ecological system subject to changes that are nonlinear, abrupt, and irreversible?
Related critical questions and topics:
- - Arctic Council keeps EU in the cold
- - As an Arctic nation, U.S. must embrace smart, science-based stewardship
- - Beyond the ice
- - Canadian Arctic waters get more protection
- - Co-management of Marine Resources in Arctic Areas with Respect to Indigenous Peoples and Traditional Ecological Knowledge
- - Council of the European Union: Council conclusions on Arctic issues
- - EU Vote Could Lead to Tight Ban on Seal Products
- - Nunavut Land Claims Agreement
- - NWT Premier urges involement in northern strategy
- - Parliamentarians highlight role of Barents Cooperation
- - Strengthening the Barents Regional Council
- - Sweden leading the EU
- - The challenge and the promise of indigenous peoples’ fishing rights—from dependency to agency
- - The EU's Baltic Strategy adopted
- - Time for an EU Barents Strategy
What question would you add?
We at Arctic Governance project encourage you to contribute and add
a question you find important in the preservation of the Arctic.
The Arctic Governance Project will not publish or distribute your
name or information without having contacted you directly. Certain
responses may be included with the Critical Questions, but the
author will be contacted before their response is posted. We
appreciate your input and invite you to contribute your voice to the
conversation on Arctic Governance.
Revise a question
TESTING
The Arctic Governance Project will not publish or distribute your
name or information without having contacted you directly. Certain
responses may be included with the Critical Questions, but the
author will be contacted before their response is posted. We
appreciate your input and invite you to contribute your voice to the
conversation on Arctic Governance.
2009-06-22
RSS AGP Newsfeed